Whilst acknowledging the incredible feats undertaken in 2010 by: Crystal Palace FC (staying up on the last day of the season in the most dramatic of do-or-die denouements), the anti-BNP alliance in Barking and Dagenham (despite what you may have seen on Channel 4, it wasn’t Mrs Hodge and her two helpers alone who ran Griffin out of town), the Daggers (a Pub Team from Essex in the same league as Wednesday, Charlton and the Saints), and, of course the Liberal Democrats (2003’s ‘left-of-Labour’ party now propping up the most upper-class elite since McMillan)…the story of the year has to be that of the Chilean miners.
The last two review-of-the-year articles that I’ve read have both stressed the significance to their survival and escape of God. Granted, poor latinos, along with the disadvantaged in many other parts of the world, have long been able to reconcile their religious faith with progressive politics. What these commentators seemed at such pains to avoid is any refernce to the iron discipline of the trade union culture so crucial to the mental and physical strength of the group.
The concept of society has been under attack ever since Thatcher denied there was any such thing. Her ideology was specifically targeted at those institutions that bind people together and value solidarity. Cameron's Big Society is an oxymoron - a veil that hides the transfer of collective responsibility to individuals.
The latest round of train-fare rises was greeted on Five Live with a predictable round of ‘good – I don’t use trains…transfer the burden from the tax-payer to the fare-payer… why should I subsidise the network?’ texts and emails. Why indeed? Because a key feature of a civilised society is a an efficient railway system that gets people where they need to go at a reasonable price. Society is all about providing for the needs of those less fortunate, and this is far too significant a duty to be voluntary.
Looking back at the incredible story of Los Mineros, we see a Little Society in which the strong saw as their first priority the needs of the weak, where the group took from each according to their ability and gave to each according to their need. Individuals all may have said their own private prayers, but the minute-by-minute sustenance of hope came from the strength of the group.
I wonder why no-one wants to use those values as the model for a New Politics?